BGonline.org Forums

61P-31P-33

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 8:14 a.m.

In Response To: 61P-31P-33 (Paul Weaver)

I think C (21(2) and 5(2)) is the most logical. With the black 5 point made, you want to secure a good anchor, so 24/21(2). As you normally fight high anchors with splits to get a high anchor, we can expect black splits and attempts to get a high anchor. White's made barpoint also points in that direction. With this in mind 6/3(2) should be reduce in value, as it moves checkers over the critical points for which the next fight will be. 8/5(2) does not leave shots (which it normally does), makes the strongest available 3 prime, takes away the possibility for 5 to make the 20-anchor, and keeps the checkers on the 6 in reserve for the fight for the next key point.

So I like C.

Messages In This Thread

• 61P-31P-33
  Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 4:50 a.m.
  • 61P-31P-33
    neilkaz -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 5:01 a.m.
  • 61P-31P-33
    Lucas Bauer -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 5:04 a.m.
  • 61P-31P-33, weak bot content
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 5:53 a.m.
    • Nactations of 61P-31P-33 — Y (Yoga split) Family
      Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 17 December 2011, at 6:28 a.m.
      • Nactations of 61P-31P-33 — Y (Yoga split) Family — Correction
        Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 17 December 2011, at 6:53 a.m.
        • Nactations of 61P-31P-33 — Y (Yoga split) Family — Correction
          Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 17 December 2011, at 8:22 a.m.
          • Nactations of 61P-31P-33 — Y (Yoga split) Family — Correction
            Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 17 December 2011, at 9:11 a.m.
  • 61P-31P-33
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 7:10 a.m.
    • When To Post Rollout Result
      Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 4:34 p.m.
  • 61P-31P-33
    Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 8:14 a.m.
  • 61P-31P-33
    Sam Pottle -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 9:17 a.m.
  • Correct Play in Related 65R-61P-31P-33 is Different
    Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 4:36 p.m.
    • 61P-31P-33, 65R-61P-31P-33, and twin variants
      Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 1:48 a.m.
      • 61P-55P-33 Rollout Result Posted
        Paul Weaver -- Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 4:18 p.m.
  • Three Rollout Results Posted
    Paul Weaver -- Sunday, 6 February 2011, at 3:36 a.m.
  • ALT *RO* 61P-31P-33
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 5:32 a.m.
    • ALT *RO* 61P-31P-33
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 6:12 a.m.
      • ALT *RO* 61P-31P-33
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 6:50 a.m.
        • ALT *RO* 61P-31P-33
          Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 7 February 2011, at 7:05 a.m.
          • Disadvantages of Seed 0
            Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 9:05 a.m.
            • Disadvantages of Seed 0
              Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 9:25 a.m.
              • Disadvantages of Seed 1
                Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 9:43 a.m.
                • Seed
                  Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 4:36 p.m.
            • Disadvantages of Seed 0
              Maik Stiebler -- Monday, 20 February 2012, at 7:22 a.m.
              • Disadvantages of Seed 1
                Taper_Mike -- Monday, 20 February 2012, at 8:08 a.m.
      • Nactation Update: R-Run must land between 17pt and 13pt
        Taper_Mike -- Monday, 24 October 2011, at 5:10 a.m.
        • Nactation Update: R-Run must land between 17pt and 13pt
          Nack Ballard -- Monday, 24 October 2011, at 6:01 a.m.