[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

XGR+ evals

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 12:45 a.m.

In Response To: XGR+ evals (Petter Bengtsson)

Rollouts:
61P-31P-33 [C E19 U36 A91] <5, and [C E11 U28 B90 A96?] <20*2 .6
65R-61P-31P-33 [U E13 C49 B58] 5*2
61P-55P-33 [A E19] <5

XGR+:
61P-31P-33 [C E18 U41 A95 B99]
65R-61P-31P-33 [U E25 C49 B67]
61P-55P-33 [A E8 C24]
65R-61P-55P-33 [E B8 N26 A51 C72]

Thanks, Petter. No claim can be made about XGR+ eval routinely overestimating E based on this data!

One more obvious question that I forgot to include: How does XGR+ evaluate 52D-33 for money, instead of at –6–9? (Btw, originally when I gave E's error size at –.041, I was just explaining why it was no surprise that I had no money rollout for 52D-33E-41.)

If XGR+ eval is correct that E is the best play with 65R-61P-55P-33 (not yet rolled out), then all four related positions produce a different best play. That is what I was hoping for when I proposed the twin variants (see all four diagrams).

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.