BGonline.org Forums

62-g RO

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 12:18 a.m.

More evidence that slotting this at GG seems to be a bit better than splitting. This finding is something that really surprised me !

is Player 2 score: 1 pip: 167 2 points match Crawford pip: 167 score: 0 is Player 1 XGID=-b----E-C---eE---c-e----B-:0:0:1:62:0:1:1:2:10 to play 62

1. Rollout1 13/5 eq: +0.284 Player: Opponent: 49.71% (G:14.49% B:1.47%) 50.29% (G:19.20% B:2.57%) Conf.: ± 0.001 (+0.283...+0.285) - [100.0%] Duration: 8 hours 11 minutes 2. Rollout1 24/18 13/11 eq: +0.280 (-0.004) Player: Opponent: 51.36% (G:12.63% B:1.35%) 48.64% (G:17.57% B:1.82%) Conf.: ± 0.001 (+0.279...+0.281) - [0.0%] Duration: 8 hours 21 minutes 1 101088 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Dice Seed: 29794098 Moves and cube decisions: 3-ply

eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.00.154.alpha, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross

Messages In This Thread

• 62-g RO
  neilkaz -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 12:18 a.m.
  • Data for 62-g
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 8:11 a.m.
  • 62-g RO
    christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 2:40 p.m.
    • 62-s
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 4:36 p.m.
      • 62-s
        christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:14 p.m.