BGonline.org Forums

65 is not a bad number according to XG

Posted By: Petter Bengtsson
Date: Thursday, 21 July 2011, at 12:59 a.m.

In Response To: 65 is not a bad number according to XG (Christian Plenz)

Equity before 65-roll: +0.948

Equity after 65-roll: +0.650

Difference is .298 which is less than joker threshold (0.300).

Messages In This Thread

• SEMI-FINAL
  Ray Kershaw -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 6:19 p.m.
  • SEMI-FINAL
    Petter Bengtsson -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 8:01 p.m.
    • SEMI-FINAL
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 8:05 p.m.
      • 65 is not a bad number according to XG
        Christian Plenz -- Thursday, 21 July 2011, at 12:38 a.m.
        • 65 is not a bad number according to XG
          Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 21 July 2011, at 12:59 a.m.
        • 65 is not a bad number according to XG
          eXtreme Gammon -- Thursday, 21 July 2011, at 1:00 a.m.
        • 65 is not a bad number according to XG
          Kristian Thulin -- Thursday, 21 July 2011, at 1:02 a.m.