BGonline.org Forums

xxD-32D-22

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Friday, 22 July 2011, at 3:26 a.m.

In Response To: xxD-32D-22 (Nack Ballard)

I would have played E in all of these, but knowing now that the rollout favors 54D-32D-22@, I'd guess that it also favors 52D-32D-22@. For the other two, I still like E. My reasoning would be that making our 4pt helps protect our outfield blots somewhat, and it also plays into our strength—building a prime.

I suppose that in principle, some play other than @ or E could be the top play in one of these, but I don't see anything that I like. Maybe 43D-32D-22N isn't so bad, but I prefer E.

Messages In This Thread

• Join us at Fibs this sunday 20:00 UTC watching Stick playing
  Tomawaky -- Friday, 24 June 2011, at 6:36 a.m.
  • Here is finaly the match played at Fibs between Stick and dorbel
    Tomawaky -- Monday, 18 July 2011, at 10:51 p.m.
    • Doublets are tough to play!
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 18 July 2011, at 11:40 p.m.
      • Doublets are tough to play!
        christian munk-christensen -- Tuesday, 19 July 2011, at 6:51 a.m.
      • 54D-32D-22
        Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 19 July 2011, at 11:14 p.m.
        • 54D-32D-22
          Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 4:05 a.m.
          • 54D-32D-22
            Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 5:46 p.m.
            • 54D-32D-22
              Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 6:28 p.m.
          • 54D-32D-22, data
            Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 11:41 p.m.
          • xxD-32D-22
            Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 20 July 2011, at 11:54 p.m.
            • xxD-32D-22
              Timothy Chow -- Friday, 22 July 2011, at 3:26 a.m.
              • xxD-32D-22
                Nack Ballard -- Friday, 22 July 2011, at 8:21 a.m.