[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

xxD-32D-22

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Friday, 22 July 2011, at 8:21 a.m.

In Response To: xxD-32D-22 (Timothy Chow)


2O ' ' ' '5X '3X '1X1X3O

2X ' ' ' '5O '3O '1O1O3X

32D-32D-22



2O ' ' ' '5X '3X '1X1X3O

2X ' ' ' '5O '3O1O1O '3X

43D-32D-22



2O ' ' ' '5X '3X '1X1X3O

2X ' ' ' '5O '4O ' '1O3X

52D-32D-22



2O ' ' ' '5X '3X '1X1X3O

2X ' ' ' '5O '4O1O ' '3X

54D-32D-22


I would have played E in all of these, but knowing now that the rollout favors 54D-32D-22@, I'd guess that it also favors 52D-32D-22@. For the other two, I still like E. My reasoning would be that making our 4pt helps protect our outfield blots somewhat, and it also plays into our strength—building a prime.

I suppose that in principle, some play other than @ or E could be the top play in one of these, but I don't see anything that I like. Maybe 43D-32D-22N isn't so bad, but I prefer E.

Good calls! Here is full rollout data:

    32D-32D-22 [E @44] ~5
    43D-32D-22 [E @63] ~5
    52D-32D-22 [E @4] ~10 (TCTC)
    54D-32D-22 [@ E27] ~5

Btw, a truncated rollout shows 43D-32D-22N to be -.095.

Key: E = Each (24/22(2) 6/4(2)), @ = anchor (24/20(2)), N = Near (13/11(2) 6/4(2). Margins are in thousandths; for example, in the first rollout, E is best and @ is -.044.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.