BGonline.org Forums

31P-31P-51S-62 vs 31P-31P-52S-62

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Sunday, 24 July 2011, at 10:04 p.m.

In Response To: 31P-31P-51S-62 vs 31P-31P-52S-62 (Stick)

I would have played 62S in both positions. With QF, I saw the duplication of 64, but I wouldn't have changed my play for that reason.

Messages In This Thread

• 31P-31P-51S-62 vs 31P-31P-52S-62
  mtuhtan -- Sunday, 24 July 2011, at 8:04 p.m.
  • 31P-31P-51S-62 vs 31P-31P-52S-62
    Stick -- Sunday, 24 July 2011, at 8:43 p.m.
    • 31P-31P-51S-62 vs 31P-31P-52S-62
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 24 July 2011, at 10:04 p.m.
  • 31P-31P-51S-62 vs 31P-31P-52S-62
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 24 July 2011, at 10:58 p.m.
    • Your old post
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 25 July 2011, at 12:57 a.m.
      • Your old post
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 25 July 2011, at 3:27 a.m.
    • 31P-31P-51S-62 vs 31P-31P-52S-62
      Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 25 July 2011, at 3:48 a.m.
    • Typo correction
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 25 July 2011, at 8:05 a.m.
  • Rollout
    mtuhtan -- Monday, 25 July 2011, at 9:10 p.m.