| |
BGonline.org Forums
Nigel Merrigan's formula
Posted By: Mr Majestyk In Response To: Nigel Merrigan's formula (Timothy Chow)
Date: Tuesday, 2 August 2011, at 12:04 p.m.
Tim,
Having regurgitated my shite into a more coherent explanation; somehow, in this position you managed to F it up! If I had written the article with precision and clarity in the first instance, instead of being an incompetent prick, I wouldn't be wasting my time mopping up your drivvle along with my own.
To the position:
In these positions where both sides have outfield checkers and are wastage heavy, its important to verify the wastage. Here, I would apply a Keith comparison and Ward Count. If there is a difference, I would add Lamford into the mix. However, in this position, Both Keith and Ward estimate 1 additional pip (deucept) for white. The APC,s are 43-48 and the PLT is 5. Therefore, 50+(62-5)/(5+5), 5.7*5, 28.5+1.6 = 80.1%. A figure a rollout won't give too much more than 0.5.
Stick,
Don't give up on the formula; its a good formula! I should have spent more time on the write up. In a sense, I've undermined its value. We live and learn I suppose. A little humility is good for the soul.
NBM
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.