BGonline.org Forums
Re: Opening 4-2, 6-3 (running), 4-2
Posted By: Peter G.
Date: Thursday, 21 December 2006, at 2:51 p.m.
In Response To: 42P-63R-42? (Stick)
I think 24/18 is too fancy here (though not as fancy as bringing two down ;-). What convinves me is that the major split doesn't address our outfield distribution imbalance. Therefore, 13/9 24/22 is my preference here.
Messages In This Thread
- 42P-63R-42?
Stick -- Thursday, 21 December 2006, at 4:52 a.m.
- Re: Opening 4-2, 6-3 (running), 4-2
Peter G. -- Thursday, 21 December 2006, at 2:51 p.m.
- Re: Opening 4-2, 6-3 (running), 4-2
Black Swan -- Thursday, 21 December 2006, at 3:05 p.m.
- Re: Opening 4-2, 6-3 (running), 4-2
neilkaz -- Thursday, 21 December 2006, at 3:39 p.m.
- Re: Opening 4-2, 6-3 (running), 4-2
Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 21 December 2006, at 4:05 p.m.
- Re: Opening 4-2, 6-3 (running), 4-2
lucky player -- Friday, 22 December 2006, at 2:45 a.m.
- Rollout
Stick -- Friday, 22 December 2006, at 3:33 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.