BGonline.org Forums

33

Posted By: Fabrice Liardet
Date: Friday, 19 August 2011, at 9:38 a.m.

In Response To: 33 (Michael Nielsen)

White's priority (and only decent game plan?) is to escape the badly placed back checkers. Making the bar is unambiguously good in that respect and seems to be part of the play. Then I think that switching to the 5 would make things slightly easier for White : he escapes with sixes and we don't have the ammo to blitz the remaining checker. My move of choice was 22/16 until I realized that it was illegal. So 13/10(2) bringing direct ammo bearing on the 4 and 5 points.

So 13/7 13/10(2). The idea is to contain both back checkers, not just one of them. If we can do that, White will disconnect himself.

Messages In This Thread

• 33
  Michael Nielsen -- Thursday, 18 August 2011, at 9:28 p.m.
  • 33
    Udo Moerschbach -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 12:08 a.m.
  • 33
    Chuck Bower -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 1:22 a.m.
    • 33
      Timothy Chow -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 2:20 a.m.
    • 33
      Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 9:16 a.m.
      • 33
        Chuck Bower -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 3:02 p.m.
  • 33
    Mick Dyett -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 5:45 a.m.
  • 33
    christian munk-christensen -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 7:17 a.m.
  • 33
    Fabrice Liardet -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 9:38 a.m.
  • 33
    neilkaz -- Friday, 19 August 2011, at 10:27 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Michael Nielsen -- Saturday, 20 August 2011, at 8:51 a.m.