[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Accuracy of Neils numbers in relation to Kazaross XG2 MET

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Tuesday, 23 August 2011, at 3:38 p.m.

In Response To: Accuracy of Neils numbers in relation to Kazaross XG2 MET (rew)

NN was created over 15 years ago to best match the Woolsey MET so it isn't quite accurate to the new RO'd METs, especially for short matches.

Anyhow...I suggest using Neil's New Numbers. Just memorize a 4 pt match since the old NN only had 1 relevent score (although -4-2 worked).

DON'T round the halves. (Note that I never suggested to do that)DON'T ROUND.

NNN for 5 is 7.5 rather than 8.

Nothing else is changed until we get far into the MET. NNN for 11 is still 5 and NNN for 13 is still 4.5.

However, NNN for 16 is 4 (NN for 15 was 4). NNN for 20 is 3.5 (NN for 19 was 3.5) If you go all the way to 25 I guess NNN should be 3.1 (NN was 3)

As before when you get close to 90% you have to start adjusting downward (more so when clearly above 90%)

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.