[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Posting an XG rollout, advice requested

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 25 August 2011, at 7:18 p.m.

In Response To: Thanks, Stick, for the Rollouts! (Paul Weaver)

No one mentioned that 43D-53P-61 is unlikely to occur because the second roll 53 should be played by hitting 24/16*.

I was planning to in my summary. :) It reminds me a bit of the 43S-42P-31 + 43S-64P-31 pair on pp. 60–61 of our book; we chose not to include 43S-53P-31 because 53H is the right play.

Instead of 43D-53P-61, you could have used 43D-64P-61, but 64P is also a wrong reply (though less egregious), just as it is in the 43D-42P-21 + 43D-64P-21 pair that I posted separately.

Mistaken openers and replies make pairs and trios less ideally publishable, but as you say they're still instructive. We just call them "reference positions." :)

When Neil finishes his 124k rollout, I'll post a nacbrac summary of the various positions discussed in this thread. In the meantime, I'll post my own rollouts to which I've alluded (starting with Snowie and GnuBG).

I just acquired XG (finally); anybody have tips on how to post an XG rollout?

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.