BGonline.org Forums

Let the next thread on the subject begin

Posted By: Michael Crane
Date: Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 12:13 p.m.

In Response To: Let the next thread on the subject begin (Gregg Cattanach)

Hasn't the whole idea of a 'touch move' been discarded in favour of a 'lift move'?

How can beginners be put off by a rule that is new to them? They are learning to play and therefore will learn how to manage any new 'lift rule' that might be adopted.

I do get the occasional dispute between players when opponents try out a move or two before making one. If you were to watch Julian Fetterlein play you'd see just how many times he tries out candidate moves. All the time this is going on his opponent is having to make a mental note of where the checkers actually originated.

I still reckon placing 'checkers' or 'markers' on the points played from is a workable solution, and obtaining them is simple because they don't have to match the original checkers at all - being different is the key. They will stand out and show the exact location of the 'lifted' checkers' original location.

Messages In This Thread

• Let the next thread on the subject begin
  Mike Main -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 10:32 a.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    Stick -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 10:41 a.m.
    • Let the next thread on the subject begin
      Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 11:59 a.m.
      • Let the next thread on the subject begin
        Michael Crane -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 12:13 p.m.
        • Let the next thread on the subject begin
          Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 12:33 p.m.
          • Let the next thread on the subject begin
            Chiva Tafazzoli -- Friday, 2 September 2011, at 7:03 p.m.
        • Let the next thread on the subject begin
          Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 2:16 p.m.
  • Bravo Mike! +1 *NM*
    mtuhtan -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 11:07 a.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    christian munk-christensen -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 11:32 a.m.
    • Let the next thread on the subject begin
      neilkaz -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 3:51 p.m.
      • Penalty button
        Tom Keith -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 4:43 p.m.
        • Penalty button
          mamabear -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 5:22 p.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    Bob Koca -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 1:35 p.m.
    • Let the next thread on the subject begin
      mamabear -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 5:18 p.m.
      • Let the next thread on the subject begin
        Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 5:37 p.m.
    • Let the next thread on the subject begin
      Mike Main -- Friday, 2 September 2011, at 11:44 p.m.
  • Who is Hell is Mike Main?
    Paul Weaver -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 3:57 p.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    mamabear -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 5:36 p.m.
    • Let the next thread on the subject begin
      Tom Keith -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 5:44 p.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 5:42 p.m.
  • Some thought about the structure and goal of a given law and his rules.
    higonefive -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 7:56 p.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    Bill Riles -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 8:16 p.m.
    • Good to see you back Bill!
      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 10:24 p.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    Barry Silliman -- Friday, 2 September 2011, at 1:37 a.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 2 September 2011, at 2:15 a.m.
  • Let the next thread on the subject begin
    Chiva Tafazzoli -- Friday, 2 September 2011, at 2:50 p.m.