| |
BGonline.org Forums
Let the next thread on the subject begin
Posted By: mamabear In Response To: Let the next thread on the subject begin (Mike Main)
Date: Thursday, 1 September 2011, at 5:36 p.m.
I cannot see the point of changing the current procedure at all, except to empower a director to impose a lift-move rule upon a player who is guilty of excessive shuffling. This imposition could be for just that match, for the rest of that event, or for the entire tournament depending on the particulars. Prominent among the aforementioned particulars, if I were director, would be whether the shuffled checkers usually end up back where they belong, and whether in the end a legal play is made.
The director would be given plenty of leeway on this, so that he or she could use their judgment as to whether the problem has to do with prestidigitation, or the much more common problem, especially at the lower levels, of mere adiposidigitation. In the latter case, a friendly warning may solve the problem without hard feelings.
I would add here that one reason this rather stale chestnut has popped (again!) at this time, is that a perceived need for a lift-move rule may be in part an unintended consequence of the adoption of "legal moves". If your opponent has set up five or six different plays, you may have a hard time figuring out what happened at the end of the day (so to speak--in unclocked games, this practice is also a time-related issue.) This is not an argument for or against legal moves--just a note that we may be seeing a butterfly effect here.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.