BGonline.org Forums

Why no Jacoby rule in match play?

Posted By: Colin Owen
Date: Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:45 p.m.

In Response To: Why no Jacoby rule in match play? (mtuhtan)

You can't win a gammon at 2a 1a with Jacoby (and Crawford)? Good! Why should you be able to win a gammon when, because of his superior results thus far in the match, it is of no value to your opponent?

Messages In This Thread

• Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
  leobueno -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:20 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    mtuhtan -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:24 p.m.
    • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
      Colin Owen -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:45 p.m.
      • No gammons
        mtuhtan -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 2:16 p.m.
        • No gammons
          Colin Owen -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 2:29 p.m.
    • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 9:37 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    bill -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:41 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    Tom Keith -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 3:11 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 5:41 p.m.
    • excellent explanation *NM*
      Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 6:23 p.m.
      • +1 *NM*
        Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 6:52 p.m.
        • +1 and Links to Tim's other Jacoby Rule posts
          Taper_Mike -- Monday, 12 September 2011, at 10:31 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    higonefive -- Monday, 12 September 2011, at 6:59 p.m.