BGonline.org Forums

+1 and Links to Tim's other Jacoby Rule posts

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Monday, 12 September 2011, at 10:31 p.m.

In Response To: +1 *NM* (Casper van der Tak)

Thanks, Tim, for the great nuance in your explanations of the Jacoby Rule. They have done more to clarify my understanding of the Jacoby Rule than anything else. Blitz Cube 6 (rec.games.backgammon) 54 To Play (rec.games.backgammon) How not to blitz (rec.games.backgammon) Do we want fun or speed? Do we want fun or speed? and the Jacoby rule Why no Jacoby rule in match play? Mike

Messages In This Thread

• Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
  leobueno -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:20 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    mtuhtan -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:24 p.m.
    • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
      Colin Owen -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:45 p.m.
      • No gammons
        mtuhtan -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 2:16 p.m.
        • No gammons
          Colin Owen -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 2:29 p.m.
    • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 9:37 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    bill -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 1:41 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    Tom Keith -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 3:11 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 5:41 p.m.
    • excellent explanation *NM*
      Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 6:23 p.m.
      • +1 *NM*
        Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 11 September 2011, at 6:52 p.m.
        • +1 and Links to Tim's other Jacoby Rule posts
          Taper_Mike -- Monday, 12 September 2011, at 10:31 p.m.
  • Why no Jacoby rule in match play?
    higonefive -- Monday, 12 September 2011, at 6:59 p.m.