BGonline.org Forums

Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 2:12 a.m.

In Response To: Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule? (happyjuggler0)

"Safe" would be an ugly 5/4*(2) 8/7 13/12 or a weak 8/7 13/12(3)? With 4 back already, 6/4*(2) should trade just a few more gammon losses 10/36 of the time for a lot more wins some portion of 26/36 of the time.

Messages In This Thread

• Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
  happyjuggler0 -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 1:39 a.m.
  • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
    Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 2:12 a.m.
    • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
      Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 6:34 a.m.
  • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
    Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 5:37 a.m.
    • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
      Turz -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 8:56 a.m.
      • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
        christian munk-christensen -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 12:10 p.m.
        • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
          garyo -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 2:35 p.m.
      • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
        Ben E. -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 12:35 p.m.
  • Safe, or Stick's 5-point rule?
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 2:18 p.m.
  • rollout
    happyjuggler0 -- Tuesday, 13 September 2011, at 11:51 p.m.