BGonline.org Forums

New Gnubg build with XG2 MET

Posted By: Henrik Bukkjaer
Date: Thursday, 6 October 2011, at 1:27 p.m.

In Response To: New Gnubg build with XG2 MET (Daniel Murphy)

Why is it better to use a MET that has been created XG, rather than one created on GNU itself?

I can understand, objectively, why one MET would be theoretically more correct than another, if the play that has been used to generate it, is stronger.

But will it also be better when applied to other players (GNU instead of XG)?

I haven't thought it through myself, but it doesn't strike me as being obvious either way.

Messages In This Thread

• New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
  Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 3 October 2011, at 4:32 p.m.
  • New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
    kruidenbuiltje -- Monday, 3 October 2011, at 7:24 p.m.
    • New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
      Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 3 October 2011, at 8:27 p.m.
      • New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
        kruidenbuiltje -- Tuesday, 4 October 2011, at 5:49 p.m.
        • New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
          Michael Petch -- Tuesday, 4 October 2011, at 6:12 p.m.
        • XG2 MET on older GNUBG
          Michael Petch -- Tuesday, 4 October 2011, at 6:23 p.m.
          • XG2 MET on older GNUBG
            kruidenbuiltje -- Tuesday, 4 October 2011, at 7:44 p.m.
            • XG2 MET on older GNUBG
              kruidenbuiltje -- Tuesday, 4 October 2011, at 7:59 p.m.
  • New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
    Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 6 October 2011, at 1:27 p.m.
    • New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
      Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 6 October 2011, at 7:26 p.m.
      • New Gnubg build with XG2 MET
        Henrik Bukkjaer -- Thursday, 6 October 2011, at 10:17 p.m.