BGonline.org Forums
Insignificant Correction: Example should be 52S-55A-2-C
Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Sunday, 23 October 2011, at 1:08 a.m.
In Response To: Insignificant Correction: Example should be 52S-55A-2-C (Taper_Mike)
Thanks, and confirmed. The first roll of the sequence was intended to be 52 (instead of 62).
Stick may feel free to make the changes in such original posts and delete such correction posts if he likes.
Nack
Messages In This Thread
- 41S-41K-62-44?
John O'Hagan -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 1:18 p.m.
- 41S-41K-62-44?
Paul Weaver -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 1:39 p.m.
- 41S-41K-62-44?
Wilcox -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 3:02 p.m.
- Nactation
David Rockwell -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 3:31 p.m.
- Nactation
Nack Ballard -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 7:18 p.m.
- 41S-41K-62-44?
ah_clem -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 2:21 p.m.
- 41S-41K-62-44?
neilkaz -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 3:36 p.m.
- 41S-41K-2-44
Nack Ballard -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 7:10 p.m.
- Nactation for White's entering play
Nack Ballard -- Friday, 8 July 2011, at 7:37 p.m.
- RO
John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 9 July 2011, at 2:15 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.