| |
BGonline.org Forums
8 roll minimum
Posted By: Colin Owen In Response To: 8 roll minimum (Nack Ballard)
Date: Wednesday, 26 October 2011, at 5:49 p.m.
I was anticipating that Nack (or some other genius) would turn his hand to sorting out this mess of a position. I think there is a mistake though in Nacks' standard notation; on move 4) it's 9/7 not 8/7(2). He must be out of practice on the old method.
As Lord Sir Alan Sugar (or whatever is his title) has stated on the UKs' "The Apprentice": 'It's (only) a corner shop.' But it does seem surprising that this particular one couldn't do better here; especially as cheap boards such as this invariably come with an instruction leaflet - including the starting setup!
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.