BGonline.org Forums

52S-42P-62 ***RO***

Posted By: Dmitriy Obukhov
Date: Monday, 14 November 2011, at 8:25 p.m.

In Response To: 52S-42P-62 (Nack Ballard)

Typically, 52S-xxx-62Z (Z being 24/22 13/7) is the best play.

I will start a new 52S-xxx-62 thread. If there is enough interest, we can also look at 52S-xxx-21.

Bellow is RO for 52S-42P-62:

		White is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 161 Unlimited Game Jacoby Beaver pip: 160 score: 0 Blue is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-D---eD---b-d-bA-A-:0:0:1:26:0:0:3:0:10
Blue to play 26

1.	Rollout1	24/22 13/7	eq: -0.1971
	Player: Opponent: 44.71% (G:12.10% B:0.50%) 55.29% (G:13.77% B:0.59%) Conf.: ±0.0077 (-0.2048...-0.1894) - [100.0%] Duration: 22 minutes 57 seconds
2.	Rollout1	22/16 13/11	eq: -0.2216 (-0.0245)
	Player: Opponent: 45.55% (G:11.80% B:0.60%) 54.45% (G:18.82% B:0.89%) Conf.: ±0.0075 (-0.2291...-0.2140) - [0.0%] Duration: 20 minutes 38 seconds
3.	Rollout1	22/14	eq: -0.2395 (-0.0424)
	Player: Opponent: 45.16% (G:11.05% B:0.60%) 54.84% (G:18.29% B:0.67%) Conf.: ±0.0074 (-0.2469...-0.2321) - [0.0%] Duration: 21 minutes 57 seconds
1 5184 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves and cube decisions: 3-ply

eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.01

Messages In This Thread

• 51S-42P-62 — Is this too obvious?
  Taper_Mike -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 1:13 a.m.
  • 51S-42P-62 — Is this too obvious?
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 2:30 a.m.
    • 51S-42P-62 — Is this too obvious?
      David Rockwell -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 3:44 a.m.
    • 51S-42P-62 — Is this too obvious?
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 4:03 p.m.
      • 52S-42P-62
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 6:15 p.m.
        • 52S-42P-62 ***RO***
          Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 8:25 p.m.
  • 51S-42P-62 — Is this too obvious?
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 14 November 2011, at 4:20 p.m.
  • 51S-42P-62 — 52S-42P-62 — 5k, 3-ply Rollouts
    Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 15 November 2011, at 5:58 a.m.