BGonline.org Forums

Deceptively simple position

Posted By: Stick
Date: Friday, 18 November 2011, at 2:30 a.m.

In Response To: Deceptively simple position (Casper van der Tak)

When first looking at this I was doing a quick look through and agree that the only part of the play that is 'forced' is 24/20. Coming up with the back checker in these instances is my reflex play probably from playing with the bots too much. I don't know if 11/10 is better or not here due to the minor duplication but as long as you play 24/20 OtB I think you're headed in the right direction.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Deceptively simple position
  Mislav Kovacic -- Wednesday, 16 November 2011, at 11:28 p.m.
  • Deceptively simple position
    Stick -- Wednesday, 16 November 2011, at 11:42 p.m.
    • Deceptively simple position
      Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 16 November 2011, at 11:51 p.m.
      • Deceptively simple position
        Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 1:37 a.m.
        • Deceptively simple position
          David Kettler -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 4:36 a.m.
          • +1 *NM*
            Joe Russell -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 1:55 p.m.
          • Deceptively simple position
            Seth -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 1:54 p.m.
      • Deceptively simple position
        Fabrice Liardet -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 8:49 a.m.
        • Deceptively simple position
          Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 6:08 p.m.
      • Deceptively simple position
        Stick -- Friday, 18 November 2011, at 2:30 a.m.
  • Deceptively simple position
    Turz -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 3:10 p.m.
  • Deceptively simple position
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 17 November 2011, at 3:55 p.m.
  • Great problem! Some bot info
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 20 November 2011, at 7:23 p.m.