BGonline.org Forums

64S-64X-22

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 24 November 2011, at 4:26 p.m.

In Response To: Nactation question 03 (Mochy)

64S-64X-22

My answer is [Q E12 m15 R31 e32 M53]. Am I correct?

Perfect, except:

• M and m should be switched
• R should be U or (I prefer) H.

You can get away with R here because 24/18* is the runningest play available, but technically (by new rules) an R move must have a destination between the 17pt and 13pt for at least one of the move portions.

To designate XGR++, you can use ++ or the new shorthand & (ampersand) after the bracket, followed by an e for evaluation (or maybe the e is unnecessary if it will never be possible to do rollouts with XGR++). In other words, the complete nacbrac for the XGR++ eval is

64S-64X-22 [Q E12 M15 H31 e32 m53] &e

While I typically include the eval/rollout settings after the brackets in any case, I tend to include the name of the position (e.g., 64S-64X-22) prior to the bracket only as part of a list or if it is not otherwise obvious in context.

I'm in the middle of packing and need to hit the road soon, so I'll let Mike explain/link the use of M and m, and why not R. After I return in a few days, I may add a comment or two to this thread.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Nactation question 03
  Mochy -- Thursday, 24 November 2011, at 11:49 a.m.
  • 64S-64X-22
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 24 November 2011, at 4:26 p.m.
    • 64S-64X-22
      Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 26 November 2011, at 1:20 a.m.
      • 64S-64X-22
        Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 29 November 2011, at 1:56 a.m.
        • 64S-64X-22
          Mochy -- Tuesday, 29 November 2011, at 2:44 a.m.
        • 64S-64X-22 — Insignificant Correction
          Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 29 November 2011, at 4:11 a.m.
          • 64S-64X-22 — Insignificant Correction
            Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 29 November 2011, at 2:05 p.m.