| |
BGonline.org Forums
65R-51S-66
Posted By: David Rockwell In Response To: 65R-51S-66 (David Rockwell)
Date: Saturday, 3 December 2011, at 3:10 p.m.
After reading some of the other posts, I'd like to comment about 65R-51S-66 specifically. I don't like O (13-7(2), 8-2*(2)) here because the tempo hit has reduced value since responder has few point making numbers next turn. Contrast this to 65R-41S-66 where responder has a bundle. Focusing on this fundamental concept will help solve many opening choices such as 51S-43 vs 41S-43.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.