[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

42P-44B-32

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Tuesday, 6 December 2011, at 2:45 p.m.

In Response To: 42P-44B-32 (Nack Ballard)

I wouldn't play 24/22 13/10 because it attempts to make an anchor that already has a blocking point 6 away from it.

We do need an advanced anchor, though, to counter Whites, so 24/21 is part of my move. 13/8 improves our distribution, but I think our back men are already in danger of being primed, so we need to get them moving.

I wouldn't want to let White run with a hitting six, so that leaves me also playing 24/21 6/4.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.