| |
BGonline.org Forums
42P-44B-32
Posted By: Ian Shaw In Response To: 42P-44B-32 (Nack Ballard)
Date: Tuesday, 6 December 2011, at 2:45 p.m.
I wouldn't play 24/22 13/10 because it attempts to make an anchor that already has a blocking point 6 away from it.
We do need an advanced anchor, though, to counter Whites, so 24/21 is part of my move. 13/8 improves our distribution, but I think our back men are already in danger of being primed, so we need to get them moving.
I wouldn't want to let White run with a hitting six, so that leaves me also playing 24/21 6/4.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.