| |
BGonline.org Forums
63S-62X-32 and 62S-62X-32
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: 63S-21X-32 and 62S-21X-32 (Nack Ballard)
Date: Thursday, 8 December 2011, at 6:17 p.m.
Those who might slightly object to the previously posted position pair because 21X is not the best reply to 63S and 62S (by bot aggregate, 21H is better by .018 and .012, respectively) might prefer the position pair below:
On the left, P (Point, bar/23 13/10) is best. On the right, @ (anchor, bar/22 24/22) is best. The nacbrac summary is:
63S-62X-32
62S-62X-32
63S-62X-32 [P @14] "<=10
62S-62X-32 [@ P73] "&eThe first result can be viewed here. The second nacbrac represents only an XGR++ eval, but it should be close enough for purposes of contrast.
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.