[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

63S-62X-32 and 62S-62X-32

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 8 December 2011, at 6:17 p.m.

In Response To: 63S-21X-32 and 62S-21X-32 (Nack Ballard)

Those who might slightly object to the previously posted position pair because 21X is not the best reply to 63S and 62S (by bot aggregate, 21H is better by .018 and .012, respectively) might prefer the position pair below:


1O ' ' ' '5X1X3X ' ' '4O

1X '1X ' '5O '3O '1O '4X

63S-62X-32



1O ' ' ' '5X1X3X ' ' '4O

1X '1X ' '5O '3O ' '1O4X

62S-62X-32


On the left, P (Point, bar/23 13/10) is best. On the right, @ (anchor, bar/22 24/22) is best. The nacbrac summary is:

    63S-62X-32 [P @14] "<=10
    62S-62X-32 [@ P73] "&e

The first result can be viewed here. The second nacbrac represents only an XGR++ eval, but it should be close enough for purposes of contrast.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.