BGonline.org Forums

Earliest "too good," no board or score restriction

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Monday, 19 December 2011, at 5:40 p.m.

In Response To: Earliest "too good" with zero-point board (Nack Ballard)

If your score is –2–p (needs 2, needs 1, post-Crawford) and the opponent opens with 65J (as shown below), I believe you're too good to double.

65J-C at –2-p

If the score is –4–2 instead, I think you're only good enough to cash. (I tried playing on once, and it backfired.)

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Pointless doubles
  svilo -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 6:14 a.m.
  • Pointless doubles
    Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 7:18 a.m.
    • Pointless doubles
      Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 7:33 a.m.
  • Pointless doubles
    Stick -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 7:34 a.m.
  • Earliest money D/P with zero-point board
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 9:05 a.m.
    • Earliest money D/P with zero-point board
      Mochy -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 10:34 a.m.
    • Nack's Position Arose Three Times in Today' Chouette
      Paul Weaver -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 1:19 p.m.
    • Earliest money D/P with zero-point board
      Sam Pottle -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 3:15 p.m.
    • Earliest money D/P with zero-point board
      Stick -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 3:31 p.m.
      • Earliest "too good" with zero-point board
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 5:00 p.m.
        • Earliest "too good," no board or score restriction
          Nack Ballard -- Monday, 19 December 2011, at 5:40 p.m.