BGonline.org Forums

backgammon contest nomenclature proposal

Posted By: christian munk-christensen
Date: Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 1:11 p.m.

In Response To: backgammon contest nomenclature proposal (Chuck Bower)

I have never met anybody who struggled to grasp the current "backgammon contest nomenclature".

Why do you want to propose a change to something which isn't broken?

Messages In This Thread

• backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
  Chuck Bower -- Friday, 23 December 2011, at 10:39 p.m.
  • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
    Tom Keith -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 2:24 a.m.
    • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 2:48 a.m.
      • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
        Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 2:59 a.m.
        • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
          Perry Gartner -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 9:46 a.m.
          • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
            Strato -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 12:31 p.m.
          • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
            Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 8:02 p.m.
            • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
              Art Grater -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 9:01 p.m.
              • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
                Christian Munk-Christensen -- Sunday, 25 December 2011, at 5:14 p.m.
                • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
                  Art Grater -- Monday, 26 December 2011, at 8:03 a.m.
  • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
    Art Grater -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 8:58 a.m.
  • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
    christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 1:11 p.m.
  • backgammon contest nomenclature proposal
    Colin Owen -- Saturday, 24 December 2011, at 7:30 p.m.