| |
BGonline.org Forums
65R-41 at –15–10
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: 65R 41? (Casper van der Tak)
Date: Sunday, 25 December 2011, at 6:45 p.m.
Hmmm, interesting. The score would somewhat argue for the split, so curious about this one.
Unless I'm looking at it backwards, XGR++ was trailing –15–10 when it played 65R-41$. Its chosen move makes sense; playing $ (Slot, 13/9 6/5) seems like an appropriate checker play adjustment to the match score.
I don't know how XGR++ evaluates 65R-41 as for money because its "book" value is [S $8] based on a 10k 3-ply rollout. It hasn't yet been upgraded to [S $1] based on Neil's 46k 4-ply rollout.
At –15–10, XGR++'s evaluation is [$ S1].
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.