BGonline.org Forums

3-2 play

Posted By: Stick
Date: Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 9:49 p.m.

In Response To: 3-2 play (Daniel Murphy)

[51 52 43 53 33 44 66] Noted that 51 and 53 are indirects, they're still a fair number of shots. 33 is clearly not that shabby though.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• 3-2 play
  pontiac -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 5:20 p.m.
  • 3-2 play
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 8:14 p.m.
  • 3-2 play
    garyo -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 8:32 p.m.
  • 3-2 play
    Michael Depreli -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 9:07 p.m.
    • 3-2 play
      Stick -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 9:19 p.m.
      • 3-2 play
        Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 9:25 p.m.
        • 3-2 play
          Stick -- Wednesday, 18 January 2012, at 9:49 p.m.
      • 3-2 play (Real Backgammon)
        Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 8:43 a.m.
    • 3-2 play
      pontiac -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 7:37 a.m.
      • 3-2 play
        Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 9:40 a.m.
        • 3-2 play
          pontiac -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 10:39 a.m.
          • 3-2 play
            Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 11:10 a.m.
            • 3-2 play
              pontiac -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 11:34 a.m.
              • 3-2 play
                Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 12:04 p.m.
      • 3-2 play
        Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 3:56 p.m.
        • 3-2 play
          pontiac -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 4:42 p.m.
      • 3-2 play
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 19 January 2012, at 4:49 p.m.
        • 3-2 play
          pontiac -- Friday, 20 January 2012, at 10:41 a.m.