BGonline.org Forums

Retro-Puzzle: Solution

Posted By: Michael Depreli
Date: Sunday, 29 January 2012, at 10:01 p.m.

In Response To: Retro-Puzzle: Solution (Nack Ballard)

Nack :

In the sequence that actually occurred, please verify that all checker plays and cube decisions are XGR++ eval within .020 (my definition of well played). If so (and 10 or fewer rolls occurred before the 51), let me know. I'm heading off to volleyball now, but I'll log in tomorrow and perhaps have a little puzzle to work on. :)

Verified captain!

p.s. I believe the sequence was played perfectly.

Michael

Messages In This Thread

• Retro-Puzzle
  Nack Ballard -- Friday, 27 January 2012, at 4:53 p.m.
  • Retro-Puzzle
    Bob Koca -- Friday, 27 January 2012, at 6:26 p.m.
    • Retro-Puzzle
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 27 January 2012, at 6:57 p.m.
      • Retro-Puzzle
        Bob Koca -- Friday, 27 January 2012, at 7:15 p.m.
        • Retro-Puzzle
          eXtreme Gammon -- Friday, 27 January 2012, at 9:32 p.m.
  • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 29 January 2012, at 7:15 p.m.
    • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
      Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 29 January 2012, at 7:34 p.m.
      • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 29 January 2012, at 9:23 p.m.
        • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
          Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 29 January 2012, at 10:01 p.m.
          • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
            Nack Ballard -- Monday, 30 January 2012, at 6:11 p.m.
            • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
              Michael Depreli -- Monday, 30 January 2012, at 6:23 p.m.
              • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
                Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 31 January 2012, at 2:46 a.m.
                • Retro-Puzzle: Solution
                  Michael Depreli -- Tuesday, 31 January 2012, at 7:38 a.m.
                  • 63R-52S-63P-63&-65N-32C-64N-51
                    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 31 January 2012, at 11:38 p.m.