| |
BGonline.org Forums
53P-21S-65 and 53P-41S-65
Posted By: Taper_Mike In Response To: 53P-21S-65 and 53P-41S-65 ***RO*** (Dmitriy Obukhov)
Date: Monday, 6 February 2012, at 8:24 a.m.
Red: Dmitriy
Black: MikeFirst two are XG1 rollouts. Second two are XG2. Running is correct in both positions. It appears that split is closer decision against 11pt builder.
Thanks, Dmitriy, for these rollouts.
I also rolled out 42P-41S-65 and 42P-21S-65. Rather than posting them here I will start another thread.
The 42 variants should be interesting. I wonder if there are any general principals that can be identified. Your fine analysis of the positions in this thread already mentions a few.
How do you post side by side diagrams?
You can put the board diagram on the left, and the rollout data on the right, by following these steps.
- Open the XG “Export Position to Clipboard” dialog box.
- Find the drop-down list with the title “Board position.”
- The default setting is “Above.” Change it to “On the left.”
- Fill in the rest of the dialog box as you normally do.
I like to use the HTML horizontal rule to separate rollouts. You can enter one with the hr tag:
Don’t forget to put a space after the letters “hr.”
...splitting play has a different reason behind it here [in 53P-44B-65] than in 31P-21S-65, 31P-53P-65 and 31P-55P-65.
The foregoing is from your initial message in this thread. Would you please elaborate more on the differences? Thanks.
Mike
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.