BGonline.org Forums

Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Friday, 10 February 2012, at 12:11 a.m.

In Response To: Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays (Paul Weaver)

The first problem is harder without the extra information you provided. The plausible plays seem to be bar/24* 8/5, bar/22 16/15, and bar/22 6/5. Maybe bar/22 8/7 is worth considering too. If bar/24* 8/5 is correct, is it likely that one of the other plays is within 0.022 of it? It doesn't seem likely, since bar/24* hits and the others don't. So that suggests that bar/22 is correct, since the difference between the top two aces seems like it could be on the order of 0.022. I guess I would play 16/15.

Messages In This Thread

• Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
  Paul Weaver -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 1:49 p.m.
  • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
    Turz -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 2:29 p.m.
  • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
    John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 3:16 p.m.
  • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
    David Rockwell -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 4:05 p.m.
    • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
      David Rockwell -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 4:09 p.m.
    • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
      Stick -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 4:18 p.m.
      • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 5:06 p.m.
  • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
    ah_clem -- Thursday, 9 February 2012, at 10:04 p.m.
  • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
    Timothy Chow -- Friday, 10 February 2012, at 12:11 a.m.
  • Two Tough and Tricky Checker Plays
    Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 10 February 2012, at 12:19 a.m.
  • Rollout Result Posted
    Paul Weaver -- Friday, 10 February 2012, at 2:43 p.m.
    • 52D-43Z-43K-21-64R-43D-21
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 10 February 2012, at 5:53 p.m.