BGonline.org Forums

Interesting 32　RO

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 6:34 p.m.

In Response To: Interesting 32　RO (mochy)

Interesting and as mentioned this would pass me by completely OTB (it even passes me by with the QF). I will play it out some to understand it better, but the lesson seems to be that a well-timed backgame with three anchors should be respected, and that you need to get out of your way to avoid the third anchor.

Messages In This Thread

• Interesting 32
  mochy -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 6:22 p.m.
  • Interesting 32
    Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 6:54 p.m.
    • Interesting 32
      David Wells -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 10:14 p.m.
  • Interesting 32
    Mr Majestyk -- Saturday, 18 February 2012, at 7:15 p.m.
  • Mochy is Right, Very Interesting 32
    Paul Weaver -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 5:03 a.m.
  • Interesting 32
    christian munk-christensen -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 9:15 a.m.
    • Interesting 32
      Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 9:21 a.m.
      • Interesting 32
        christian munk-christensen -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 9:49 a.m.
        • Interesting 32
          Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 9:57 a.m.
  • Interesting 32
    Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 11:19 a.m.
  • Interesting 32　RO
    mochy -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 5:56 p.m.
    • Interesting 32　RO
      Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 6:34 p.m.
      • Interesting 32　RO
        Colin Owen -- Sunday, 19 February 2012, at 7:34 p.m.