BGonline.org Forums

53P-43Z-32 versus 64P-43Z-32

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Tuesday, 21 February 2012, at 8:42 a.m.

In Response To: 53P-43Z-32 — Rollouts for Money and DMP (Daniel Murphy)

53P-43Z-53 – Blue played H = 13/10 6/4*

53P-43Z-53 – Blue played K = 6/4*/1*

Daniel: [53P-43Z-32K in the diagram on the right is] a weak blitz. But perhaps if we mentioned more of the positives for the play? It puts a second checker on the bar, doubles the number of fanning numbers from 2 to 4, reduces return hits from 19 to 11, reduces return hits that hit twice from 2 to 0. This is the perspective I missed. 11 hits versus 19 is certainly significant, and no double hits to boot. I am not sure, though, what you mean by, “doubles the number of fanning numbers from 2 to 4.” Daniel: Should 6/4*/1* do a little better [after 64P-43Z] than after 53P-43Z?

64P-43Z-32 Position ID: 4HPhASKGZ/ABMA Match ID: cIkJAAAAAAAE

53P-43Z-32 [K H3.7 X21.0] "<=103*20 Position ID: 4HPhASKMZ/ABMA Match ID: cAkNAAAAAAAA

After making the 2pt in the diagram on the left, 64P-43Z-32, Blue is better positioned for an attacking game than he is for a priming game. Blue has a comparatively stronger priming game (to go along with his attacking game) in the diagram on the right, 53P-43Z-32. In the right-hand diagram, K (Kill) = 6/4*/1* is almost tied with H (Hit) = 13/10 6/4*. Because the priming chances are worse on the left, I expect that K (Kill) will fare better in a comparison with H (Hit) in that position. Daniel: May I ask, what does XG play for 53P-43Z-32 ? For money Gnubg hits twice on all plies, also at DMP except 3-ply and 4-ply which play 13/10 6/4*. [H K9.4 X29.3] "e (2-ply) [H K2.1 X19.8] "e (3-ply) [K H6.3 X24.0] "e (XG Roller) [H K0.4 X19.8] "e (4-ply) [H K0.5 X21.3] "e (XG Roller+) [K H13.4 X29.8] "e (XG Roller++) [K H3.7 X21.0] "<=103*20 What caused me to roll this out was that an XGR++ eval reported that my H (Hit) = 13/10 6/4* was second best, down by 0.013! The rollout confirms that it is a lot closer than that. Mike

Messages In This Thread

• 53P-43Z-32 — Only 96% confidence after 80k
  Taper_Mike -- Monday, 20 February 2012, at 3:00 a.m.
  • 53P-43Z-32 — Only 96% confidence after 80k
    Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 20 February 2012, at 3:23 a.m.
  • 53P-43Z-32 for money and at DMP
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 20 February 2012, at 7:31 a.m.
    • 53P-43Z-32 at DMP
      Taper_Mike -- Monday, 20 February 2012, at 9:07 p.m.
  • 53P-43Z-32 — Rollouts for Money and DMP
    Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 21 February 2012, at 5:52 a.m.
    • 53P-43Z-32 — Rollouts for Money and DMP
      Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 21 February 2012, at 6:47 a.m.
      • 53P-43Z-32 versus 64P-43Z-32
        Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 21 February 2012, at 8:42 a.m.
        • 53P-43Z-32 versus 64P-43Z-32
          Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 21 February 2012, at 8:51 a.m.
          • 53P-43Z-32 versus 64P-43Z-32
            Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 21 February 2012, at 9:15 a.m.
  • 64P-43Z-32 — Rollout
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 22 February 2012, at 6:19 a.m.
  • 31P-43Z-32 — Rollout — (aka 31P-43S-32)
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 22 February 2012, at 6:27 a.m.
  • 42P-43S-41 — Rollout
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 22 February 2012, at 6:32 a.m.
  • 42P-32S-32 — Rollout — (aka 42P-32Z-32)
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 22 February 2012, at 8:38 a.m.
  • xxP-43Z-32 — Summary and Analysis
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 22 February 2012, at 9:25 p.m.
    • xxP-43Z-32 — Summary and Analysis
      Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 22 February 2012, at 10:09 p.m.
    • xxP-43Z-32 — Summary and Analysis
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 24 February 2012, at 12:03 p.m.