I broke the 8 but thought it might be close. Wrong again . . .
          
 
         
 | | White is Player 2
score: 5
pip: 109 | | 7 point match | pip: 103
score: 4
Blue is Player 1 |
|
| XGID=-ACbBBC-B----a-----ccdBb--:0:0:1:64:4:5:0:7:10 |
| Blue to play 64 |
| 1. | Rollout1 | 22/18 22/16 | eq: +0.048 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 49.63% (G:9.88% B:0.45%)
50.37% (G:16.83% B:1.05%) | Conf.: ± 0.011 (+0.037...+0.059) - [100.0%]
Duration: 3 minutes 53 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 8/4 8/2 | eq: -0.200 (-0.248) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 43.35% (G:7.66% B:0.40%)
56.65% (G:12.41% B:0.54%) | Conf.: ± 0.013 (-0.212...-0.187) - [0.0%]
Duration: 4 minutes 42 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 22/12 | eq: -0.277 (-0.325) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 40.82% (G:12.09% B:0.94%)
59.18% (G:17.49% B:1.05%) | Conf.: ± 0.013 (-0.291...-0.264) - [0.0%]
Duration: 4 minutes 30 seconds |
|
| |
1 648 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.02, MET: Kazaross XG2
Money results are not really different:
| | White is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 109 | Unlimited Game
Jacoby Beaver | pip: 103
score: 0
Blue is Player 1 |
|
| XGID=-ACbBBC-B----a-----ccdBb--:0:0:1:64:0:0:3:0:10 |
| Blue to play 64 |
| 1. | Rollout1 | 22/18 22/16 | eq: -0.053 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 49.91% (G:9.86% B:0.35%)
50.09% (G:16.40% B:0.66%) | Conf.: ± 0.016 (-0.070...-0.037) - [100.0%]
Duration: 1 minute 37 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 8/4 8/2 | eq: -0.272 (-0.219) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 43.48% (G:7.37% B:0.20%)
56.52% (G:12.64% B:0.38%) | Conf.: ± 0.020 (-0.292...-0.253) - [0.0%]
Duration: 2 minutes 15 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 22/12 | eq: -0.330 (-0.277) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 41.16% (G:11.67% B:0.58%)
58.84% (G:18.62% B:0.59%) | Conf.: ± 0.015 (-0.346...-0.315) - [0.0%]
Duration: 1 minute 11 seconds |
|
| |
1 324 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.02