BGonline.org Forums

Playing 31: Defending Against A Backgame

Posted By: Stick
Date: Friday, 9 March 2012, at 8:59 p.m.

In Response To: Playing 31: Defending Against A Backgame (ah_clem)

I don't think this isn't quite a backgame yet

Watch your negatives.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Playing 31: Defending Against A Backgame
  Paul Weaver -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 9:48 a.m.
  • Playing 31: Defending Against A Backgame
    Stick -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 10:00 a.m.
    • Playing 31: Defending Against A Backgame
      Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 10:02 a.m.
    • If this is a NEXT then I'm Julio Iglesias! *NM*
      Mr Majestyk -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 11:13 a.m.
      • If this is a NEXT then I'm Julio Iglesias!
        Timothy Chow -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 4:48 p.m.
        • If this is a NEXT then I'm Julio Iglesias!
          Mr Majestyk -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 6:20 p.m.
        • If this is a NEXT then I'm Julio Iglesias!
          Stick -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 8:58 p.m.
          • If this is a NEXT then I'm Julio Iglesias!
            Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 12:24 a.m.
            • If this is a NEXT then I'm Julio Iglesias!
              Stick -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 4:08 a.m.
    • Wally Peever Responds to Monsieur Stick
      Paul Weaver -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 2:59 p.m.
      • Wally Peever Responds to Monsieur Stick
        Stick -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 8:59 p.m.
  • Playing 31: Defending Against A Backgame
    ah_clem -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 4:57 p.m.
    • Playing 31: Defending Against A Backgame
      Stick -- Friday, 9 March 2012, at 8:59 p.m.
  • Rollout Result Posted
    Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 6:47 p.m.