BGonline.org Forums

Well, at least the cube isn't on 2

Posted By: pontiac
Date: Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 6:58 a.m.

In Response To: Well, at least the cube isn't on 2 (Chuck Bower)

I think the principle here should be, diversify checkers to catch a blot and at the same time build your board to keep checker if you hit it.

24-18, 11-5, 10-4(2)

Messages In This Thread

• Well, at least the cube isn't on 2
  Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 12:48 a.m.
  • Well, at least the cube isn't on 2
    pontiac -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 6:58 a.m.
    • Well, at least the cube isn't on 2
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 9:45 p.m.
      • Well, at least the cube isn't on 2
        Mr Majestyk -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 11:58 p.m.
  • Well, at least the cube isn't on 2
    Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 10 March 2012, at 11:20 p.m.
  • Well, at least the cube isn't on 2 -- RO AtS
    Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 11 March 2012, at 2:45 p.m.
    • Well, at least the cube isn't on 2 -- RO at unlimted/$
      Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 11 March 2012, at 2:48 p.m.
    • Well, at least the cube isn't on 2 -- RO details
      Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 11 March 2012, at 2:51 p.m.