BGonline.org Forums

Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Saturday, 31 March 2012, at 12:56 a.m.

In Response To: Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62 (Taper_Mike)

FWIW I would have played 24/22 here on the principle that one should race when ahead in the race.

Messages In This Thread

• Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62
  Taper_Mike -- Friday, 23 March 2012, at 12:08 a.m.
  • Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62
    Stick -- Friday, 23 March 2012, at 7:58 a.m.
    • Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 23 March 2012, at 8:27 a.m.
      • Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62
        Stick -- Friday, 23 March 2012, at 8:47 a.m.
        • Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62
          Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 23 March 2012, at 9:07 a.m.
  • 32S-64H-41$-62 *** Rollouts by XG and GnuBg ***
    Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 24 March 2012, at 3:44 a.m.
    • 32S-64H-41$-62 — Unlimited Games — XG2 3-ply Rollout
      Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 3 May 2012, at 10:13 p.m.
  • Conflicting Evals of 32S-64H-41$-62
    Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 31 March 2012, at 12:56 a.m.