BGonline.org Forums

A New Argument for Clocks

Posted By: Phil Simborg
Date: Monday, 2 April 2012, at 3:31 a.m.

In Response To: A New Argument for Clocks (Daniel Murphy)

Sorry, if you cannot see the difference between an objective time limit and a subjective one, I have no chance of convincing you. Some people simple refuse to be convinced when they have an opinion. That's okay, you are entitled to your opinion. But your argument here is specious.

Messages In This Thread

• A New Argument for Clocks
  Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 2:04 a.m.
  • A New Argument for Clocks
    Bob Koca -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 3:32 a.m.
    • A New Argument for Clocks
      Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 3:49 a.m.
  • A New Argument for Clocks
    Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 4:33 a.m.
    • A New Argument for Clocks
      Phil Simborg -- Saturday, 31 March 2012, at 2:32 p.m.
      • A New Argument for Clocks
        Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 31 March 2012, at 3:41 p.m.
        • A New Argument for Clocks
          Phil Simborg -- Monday, 2 April 2012, at 3:31 a.m.
          • A New Argument for Clocks
            Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 2 April 2012, at 4:32 a.m.
            • A New Argument for Clocks
              Tom Keith -- Monday, 2 April 2012, at 5:18 p.m.
  • A New Argument for Clocks
    Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 7:26 a.m.
  • A New Argument for Clocks
    Patrick De Wilde -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 8:54 a.m.
    • +1 *NM*
      Chiva Tafazzoli -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 9:28 a.m.
  • Questions for Mr. Simborg
    Paul Weaver -- Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 3:51 p.m.
    • Questions for Mr. Simborg
      David Rockwell -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 1:13 a.m.
    • Questions for Mr. Simborg
      Phil Simborg -- Saturday, 31 March 2012, at 2:24 p.m.
      • Questions for Mr. Simborg
        higonefive -- Sunday, 1 April 2012, at 7:18 a.m.
  • A New Argument for Clocks
    leemo -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 2:04 a.m.