BGonline.org Forums

21V-51?

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 23 April 2012, at 11:15 p.m.

In Response To: 21V-51? (Ian Shaw)

I'd play K here, though I suspect that K and S are close.

Messages In This Thread

• 21V-51?
  Ian Shaw -- Monday, 23 April 2012, at 4:33 p.m.
  • 21V-51?
    David Rockwell -- Monday, 23 April 2012, at 5:44 p.m.
  • 21V-51?
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 April 2012, at 11:15 p.m.
  • 21V-51 and variant
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 12:59 p.m.
    • 21V-51 and variant
      David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 1:38 p.m.
      • 21V-51 and variant
        Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 2:41 p.m.
    • 21V-51 and variant
      Ian Shaw -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 4:59 p.m.
    • 21V-51 and variant
      Dmitriy Obukhov -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 7:30 p.m.
      • 21V-51 and variant
        Ian Shaw -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 9:53 p.m.
        • 21V-51 and variant
          Dmitriy Obukhov -- Wednesday, 25 April 2012, at 4:56 a.m.
    • 21V-51, rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 1:19 p.m.
      • 21V-51, rollout
        Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 7:24 p.m.
        • 21V-51 — TCTC after 82k *** Rollout ***
          Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 28 April 2012, at 3:46 a.m.
          • 21V-51 — TCTC after 82k *** Rollout ***
            Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 28 April 2012, at 11:55 p.m.
            • 21V-51 — TCTC after 82k *** Rollout ***
              Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 29 April 2012, at 9:09 a.m.
    • 21V-51 *variant, rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 2:04 p.m.
  • 21V-51?
    Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 25 April 2012, at 4:14 p.m.
    • 21V-51 — Does your rollout use the Jacoby Rule?
      Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 2 May 2012, at 1:13 a.m.