BGonline.org Forums
21V-51 and variant
Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 1:38 p.m.
In Response To: 21V-51 and variant (Nack Ballard)
I would play K in the variant. Splitting is less effective facing four on the eight point. For exemple, it doesn't prevent making two points on rolls of 33 and 11 as it does when there are three checkers on the eight.
Messages In This Thread
- 21V-51?
Ian Shaw -- Monday, 23 April 2012, at 4:33 p.m.
- 21V-51?
David Rockwell -- Monday, 23 April 2012, at 5:44 p.m.
- 21V-51?
Timothy Chow -- Monday, 23 April 2012, at 11:15 p.m.
- 21V-51 and variant
Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 12:59 p.m.
- 21V-51 and variant
David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 1:38 p.m.
- 21V-51 and variant
Ian Shaw -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 4:59 p.m.
- 21V-51 and variant
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012, at 7:30 p.m.
- 21V-51, rollout
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 1:19 p.m.
- 21V-51 *variant, rollout
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 2:04 p.m.
- 21V-51?
Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 25 April 2012, at 4:14 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.