BGonline.org Forums

Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 9:04 p.m.

In Response To: Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41 (Taper_Mike)

The slot seems logical - behind in the race, more checkers back, bad ace after a 41 hit, anchor on the barpoint.

Messages In This Thread

• Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41
  Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 8:48 p.m.
  • Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41
    Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 26 April 2012, at 9:04 p.m.
    • Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 27 April 2012, at 4:38 p.m.
      • Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41
        Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 27 April 2012, at 5:01 p.m.
  • Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41
    neilkaz -- Friday, 27 April 2012, at 4:58 p.m.
  • Seemingly obvious, but I missed it! — 64S-62H-61@-21R-41
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 27 April 2012, at 8:12 p.m.
  • 64S-62H-61@-21R-41 — Towering result! *** Rollout ***
    Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 28 April 2012, at 8:46 p.m.
    • 64S-62H-61@-21R-41 — Towering result! *** Rollout ***
      Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 28 April 2012, at 9:48 p.m.
    • 64S-62H-61@-21R and 64S-62H-61@-21R-41, inverted safe/bold criteria
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 28 April 2012, at 10:50 p.m.
      • Oops, duplicate post *NM*
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 29 April 2012, at 12:21 a.m.
    • 64S-62H-61@-21 and 64S-62H-61@-21R-41, inverted safe/bold criteria
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 28 April 2012, at 10:57 p.m.
    • 64S-62H-61@-21R-41, slot variants
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 28 April 2012, at 11:52 p.m.