| |
BGonline.org Forums
24pt and 23pt not counted in "More points"
Posted By: Taper_Mike In Response To: 24pt and 23pt not counted in "More points" (Nack Ballard)
Date: Monday, 30 April 2012, at 11:45 p.m.
–
41S-11E (i.e., after Blue plays E)
41S-11e (i.e., after Blue plays e)
This is a welcome change. In my posts discussing Nactation, I will use the phrase “two spares” to describe a made 23pt or made 24pt. For instance, in the example of 41S-11 from Nack’s post, I will say, “Having a blot on the 22pt beats having two spares on the 23pt.”
–
41S-66B-51 Position ID: 4NvBwQDgc+EBKA Match ID: cIkUAAAAAAAA Here is a link to a discussion of the Nactations of 41S-66B-51. According to an XG Roller++ eval, the best play is 23/22 9/4. When you can ignore the two plays that make the 23pt, this best backgammon play is nactated as upper case C. Before the new rule, however, it was relegated to 3rd place, and had to be nactated using the cumbersome italic upper case C.
In the same thread, Nack mentions that this rule is a particular boon for players of Nackgammon. When the game starts with four checkers in the rear quadrant, you can imagine that there are a lot of plays in the E (Each) family. By discounting the those that make the 23pt or 24pt, the better plays will more often rise to the top of the family.
Mike
- 31P-11E-33E-F-C
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 30 April 2012, at 4:26 a.m.
- 31P-11E-33E-F-C
Stick -- Monday, 30 April 2012, at 5:54 a.m.
- 31P-11E-33E-F-C
Nack Ballard -- Monday, 30 April 2012, at 6:51 p.m.
- 24pt and 23pt not counted in "More points"
Nack Ballard -- Monday, 30 April 2012, at 6:53 p.m.
- 24pt and 23pt not counted in "More points"
Taper_Mike -- Monday, 30 April 2012, at 11:45 p.m.
- 24pt and 23pt not counted in "More points"
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 5:48 a.m.
- Rollout
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Wednesday, 2 May 2012, at 3:19 a.m.
[ View Thread ][ Post Response ][ Return to Index ][ Read Prev Msg ][ Read Next Msg ]BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.