BGonline.org Forums

XG grading perplexity

Posted By: niuniuch
Date: Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 8:12 a.m.

In Response To: XG grading perplexity (Bob Koca)

Both options make more sense than what's actually there, I'd personally opt for the 'theoretical best' option. Arbitrarily assigning PR 0 to some 'better-than-any-human-and-close-to-perfect-but-not-quite' standard of play is just odd to me.

Messages In This Thread

• XG grading perplexity
  Simon Knight -- Sunday, 26 August 2012, at 3:35 a.m.
  • XG grading perplexity
    Simon Knight -- Wednesday, 29 August 2012, at 4:51 a.m.
    • XG grading perplexity
      Leonardo Jerkovic -- Wednesday, 29 August 2012, at 10:37 a.m.
      • XG grading perplexity
        Simon Knight -- Wednesday, 29 August 2012, at 12:53 p.m.
        • XG grading perplexity
          Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 29 August 2012, at 4:37 p.m.
          • XG grading perplexity
            Simon Knight -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 12:16 a.m.
            • XG grading perplexity
              Bob Koca -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 1:50 a.m.
          • XG grading perplexity
            niuniuch -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 8:12 a.m.
            • XG grading perplexity
              Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 8:20 a.m.
              • XG grading perplexity
                niuniuch -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 8:38 a.m.
                • XG grading perplexity
                  Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 9:28 a.m.
            • XG grading perplexity
              Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 6:26 p.m.
              • XG grading perplexity
                Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 30 August 2012, at 7:17 p.m.