BGonline.org Forums

QF #2?

Posted By: Philippe Michel
Date: Friday, 16 November 2007, at 9:40 p.m.

In Response To: QF #2? (Ian Shaw)

This looks even more 3-pointish than the first one. The fact that you're posting these as a pair makes me think I've got the other wrong.

Almost ditto. I hope you (we, really :-) have both right, but the "even" seems unwarranted. The first position wasn't that 3-pointish.

Messages In This Thread

• QF #2?
  Stick -- Friday, 16 November 2007, at 5:40 a.m.
  • QF #2?
    MandM1951 -- Friday, 16 November 2007, at 8:19 a.m.
  • QF #2?
    Ian Shaw -- Friday, 16 November 2007, at 3:04 p.m.
    • QF #2?
      Philippe Michel -- Friday, 16 November 2007, at 9:40 p.m.
  • QF #2?
    neilkaz -- Friday, 16 November 2007, at 5:42 p.m.
    • QF #2?
      Stick -- Friday, 16 November 2007, at 8:47 p.m.
  • QF #2?
    garyo -- Friday, 16 November 2007, at 6:39 p.m.
  • Rollout - 21S.53?
    Stick -- Saturday, 17 November 2007, at 9:12 a.m.
    • Rollout - 21S.53?
      Ian Shaw -- Saturday, 17 November 2007, at 10:31 a.m.
      • Rollout - 21S.53?
        Stick -- Saturday, 17 November 2007, at 11:26 a.m.
        • Rollout - 21S.53?
          Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 17 November 2007, at 2:29 p.m.
      • Rollout - 21S.53?
        Ian Shaw -- Monday, 19 November 2007, at 9:34 a.m.
        • Rollout - 21S.53?
          Stick -- Monday, 19 November 2007, at 9:51 a.m.
          • Rollout - 21S.53?
            Ian Shaw -- Monday, 19 November 2007, at 4:43 p.m.