BGonline.org Forums
Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
In Response To: Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown) (joe freedman)
I know I'd play 7/2(2) 8/3(2) but it is a bit of a strange position (cube position strange), so perhaps you could justify another play because of the cube access. I'd do the obvious thing though.
Messages In This Thread
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 5:55 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:36 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Michael Nielsen -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:10 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
backgame -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:14 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 9:12 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 10:18 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
roadkillbooks -- Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 7:47 a.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Stick -- Thursday, 20 December 2012, at 12:45 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.