BGonline.org Forums
Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 9:12 p.m.
In Response To: Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown) (joe freedman)
Of course XG can be right here. It looks like a borderline cash/play on decision and these can lead to some funny looking plays. Perhaps after 55 you don't win enuf G's by blitzing to risk losing to 61 so you should play safe and almost always cash due to big race lead.
Messages In This Thread
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 5:55 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:36 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Michael Nielsen -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:10 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
backgame -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:14 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 9:12 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 10:18 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
roadkillbooks -- Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 7:47 a.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Stick -- Thursday, 20 December 2012, at 12:45 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.