BGonline.org Forums
Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 2:04 a.m.
In Response To: Can XG be right? (Analysis shown) (joe freedman)
From a practical point of view there's a simple solution: If you don't think you can analyze the upcoming checker play very well, then just cash instead of playing on.
Messages In This Thread
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 5:55 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:36 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Michael Nielsen -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:10 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
backgame -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:14 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 9:12 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 10:18 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 2:04 a.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
ah_clem -- Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 2:55 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
roadkillbooks -- Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 7:47 a.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Stick -- Thursday, 20 December 2012, at 12:45 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.