BGonline.org Forums
Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
Posted By: 6stones
Date: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 5:08 p.m.
In Response To: Can XG be right? (Analysis shown) (ah_clem)
What other examples of position types besides 'cashing' as the reason are there where a play which wins more games, more gammons, and more backgammons while losing fewer gammons would not be the best? Some Gammon Go/Save positions?
Messages In This Thread
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 5:55 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:36 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 6:37 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Michael Nielsen -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:10 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
backgame -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 8:14 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 9:12 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis shown)
joe freedman -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 10:18 p.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
roadkillbooks -- Wednesday, 19 December 2012, at 7:47 a.m.
- Can XG be right? (Analysis not shown)
Stick -- Thursday, 20 December 2012, at 12:45 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.